Current Situation
KCC is currently offering a far deeper range of programs than it has in two decades. This is made possible by a team of teachers, three of whom offer their considerable time to KCC without compensation. This is not sustainable in the long-term (and possibly not in the medium-term). Things will only get tighter as we begin one-year retreat. Finally, part of the strategic discussions include possible plans to acquire a new urban center, which would have significant cost implications. If we did move to a new urban center, it would likely cost more over and above what we spent on it.
Possible Goals
Below are a list of goals the Strategic Planning Committee and Leadership group identified. While the groups have spent substantial time thinking and discussing them, they are only a starting place for further discussions. The SPC hopes members of the sangha think about KCC's situation, its needs, and its resources and offers feedback and suggestions. Have a look:
- Create a business plan. Discussion. The moving parts that affect finances are many and complex. It's difficult to conceptualize our needs and resources, and a business plan would clarify a number of issues.
- Develop a culture of giving. Discussion. This topic will actually be addressed in a separate post focused entirely on culture changes. The idea is to better integrate the idea of giving (among other things) within our practice of the dharma.
- Support the unpaid teachers. Discussion. This was the least fleshed out in terms of strategy, but there was a broad sense that it's unsustainable to expect teachers to be able to devote the equivalent of a part- to full-time job to KCC without having some means of compensation.
- Begin an urban center campaign, but only after the cloister at SCOL is fully funded. Discussion. This is less a goal than a matter of tactics, and one that the group was split on. Does it make sense to have two campaigns going on simultaneously? Or put in the reverse--would two campaigns focused on different goals really compete with one another?
From Dave Howard
ReplyDeletewould two campaigns focused on different goals really compete with one another? (From Blog)
One way of answering this, I thought, was to look at my own budget and think about how easy it would be to direct funds to two KCC accounts.
While this is easy to do from a bookeeping approach, it does not seem easy to me from a practical approach. I have been able from time to time to give small blocks of funds to SCOL development, while at the same time giving a monthly payment to what I think of as the Urban Center.
So why not continue that approach as we develop an Urban Center Development Campaign? It should be easy to justify. Somehow, having two multi-million dollar fundraising efforts under way at the same time just gets overwhelming to me.
Evendently my mind is just as split on this as the group was.
Dave, thanks for the comment. Your thoughts reflect much of what others said at the leadership retreat.
ReplyDeleteJeff Alworth
In order to freely give, or to give freely, one needs to feel fully listened to. We need to be accurate in this. Being splendid, rather than accurate, creates a web with holes in it, with the holes representing disillusionment or lack of trust.
ReplyDeletehttps://saglamproxy.com
ReplyDeletemetin2 proxy
proxy satın al
knight online proxy
mobil proxy satın al
ZXQ